Anarchy – a shelter from development, or the illusion of freedom in the world of souls.

In most cases, the concept of anarchy is understood in the sociological aspect. It is easy to describe it when talking about it socially, it is a situation where there is no centralized rule for a certain group or society. This article is going to discuss the relationship between sociology and spirituality. After all, the company is the first place that meets your development. If you know how this encounter manifests itself, you can leave your filters as open as possible. That is, not allowing different conclusions from your personality to interfere with the information that comes through who you are in this world. To allow the information to be assimilated into the company as it is and to respect the free choice of the individuals in it for accepting or temporarily avoiding receiving this information.

Remember, we are in the years of interrogative change. Each of you has a significant role in this exchange. You are all here because you are required for the change that the earth in general and human society in particular is going through.

We must verify the quality, reliability, and authenticity of the information we bring to the world, whether through a connection to our soul, or through any ideology we choose to adhere to because all of these are part of the foundations of the new world – according to our role in it.

The first encounter of theoretical information with the practical world is by the template. The boundaries of the sector decide which details will remain outside the system and what will enter it and be defined as the norm. These limits are determined by the management capabilities of the person who holds the information.

The leader, the one leading the way, the one who wants change – are the ones who pre-define their realization system; on a personal and social level.

The realization system’s self-determination axis moves between two poles: limits and anarchy.

In this article, I will discuss these limits and their relationship, so that two of the most prominent life lessons in the exploration of lack and abundance will gain greater awareness.

These classes do not stand out in terms of quantity but in terms of their management of the other classes. These are particularly active lessons, the first moment they are not addressed they become a kind of worldview that shapes reality according to the inner desire.

What are limits?

Boundaries are role definitions. With the help of a limit, every person, entity, and individual within a system knows the dimensions and the direction to which he can deploy his abilities. The boundaries keep us separate from each other and help us define ourselves as souls and as human beings in a way that sets us apart from the rest. With the help of the boundaries, each of us can take responsibility for the part of the whole system that defines who he is. Without definition, responsibility will flow in different directions and not reflect the original intention of the person. In this context, the intention has a huge meaning. In contrast to a goal, the intention is the way to realize a goal in a continuous manner that is not canceled by certain temporary feelings. Therefore, the boundaries define the roles of all the individuals in the system and the relationship between them in the same way as their abilities, their character, and the life lessons they seek to pass through their behavior.

What are walls?

Earth has changed many investigations in a short time. In 1952, the investigation of survival was replaced by the investigation of lack and abundance. In 2020, the replacement of the investigation of lack and abundance for the investigation of creation from infinity began. Instability or rapid and accelerating development of a world is what causes so many changes of investigation in a short period.

Therefore, there is a whole generation of people who grew up in the study of lack and abundance for parents who grew up in the study of survival. As a result, the connection between borders and development has gone awry. Examining the boundaries through a survival perspective changes their original definition and makes them feel like walls. The wall is a restriction, a fence that cannot be passed through because of a certain lack of value, ability, and more…

Children who grew up as parents from the survival investigation often translated the borders into walls and as a result tried to avoid as much as possible the sense of confinement that the walls cause.

Going outside the walls, along with a lack of emotional regulation caused a significant number of these children to use anarchy as adults as a tool to bring their inner knowledge together with society.

What is anarchy?

Anarchy is the complete absence of a certain concentration that controls the situation. That is, every individual in the system can choose, do, and behave according to his free will. This free will can fit into character traits or collective conventions. That is, anarchy is not necessarily anarchy.

If the individuals in the system have a developed conscience or a strong connection to the moral values agreed upon in that system, it is a sign that anarchy will have an internal conscience of the individuals in it.

This could be cultural anarchy in particular, but the organization of the system would be lacking. After all, there is no synchronization, even at the strongest level of communication, between the internal organization of individual individuals. Unity brings them together in synchronization. This unity does not exist in anarchy and the widest limit that the individuals in it can reach is cooperation.

Anarchy can be a real source of freedom. People can feel freedom within the anarchy they are in without feeling that it causes them a problem, on the contrary.

In most cases, people who hold anarchy as a way of realizing their information in the world can appear colorful, authentic, unique, and universally loved.

The difficulty begins when they want to carry out their plans, whether personal or collective. In such a situation, the people of anarchy encounter a wall that they are afraid of. To them, their “self” is the only factor and individual in the system. Therefore there is no possibility of bringing what they want to another party, the other party simply does not exist. The extremism in this article is clear, anarchy does not necessarily result in the elimination of various factors in reality, but rather the elimination of the possibility that something else will affect a person’s life other than who he is. On the other side of the anarchy scale is the exclusive influence of reality on his life. All this is according to the following equation:

1. If I can realize, express, and carry out my will in a way that meets my internal and external conditions: I am solely responsible for my existence.

2. If I do not have such an option; Reality is solely responsible for my existence.

The connection between borders and anarchy

Pay attention – borders and anarchy are mapping.

Many people can find themselves in some areas on the fringes and in other areas in anarchy. What decides the balance is in most cases the emotional value combined with the ability that a person gives to things. If a person feels that he is capable and can exercise, then it is likely that he will move away from the possibility to the limits to prevent another party from taking that possibility away from him.

From a border point of view, anarchy can seem like an exotic corner to be in. The diversity, the changes, the courage, and the breaking of the walls seem like a wish that the people of the borders who see themselves as “square” in certain areas only aspire to be brave enough in their own eyes to be in it. On the other hand, the people of the borders, for their part, can see in anarchy the absence of two basic life skills necessary for realization:

1. A sense of caution – without any connection to anxieties or fears, but to the spectrum of the tendency to take risks considering the inner world.

2. Lack of listening – the transitions between inner listening and listening to the outside world are very fast in anarchy. Therefore, it is not easy to anticipate the people of anarchy. For example, they can be very moral, accepting, and accommodating, but once they feel threatened they judge and criticize much more sharply than criticizing and judging a person within limits.

Limits and anarchy in development

The first meeting of the information we bring to the world and our echo of ourselves meets its pattern – the pattern of boundaries or the pattern of anarchy. Therefore, getting to know this template allows you to choose your unique imprint on the world, the form of realization that is only yours and only you know how to use it.

Keep your fulfillment with choice – when do you want anarchy? When do you want boundaries? Do you put your pain into the system of anarchy and limits and choose out of lack? These are all questions to think about in the initial stage of your realization of the world.