Home » Blog List – Classic » War and Peace- or the secrets behind the connotation

War and Peace- or the secrets behind the connotation

Different forces work inside people. The source that activates these forces can be external or internal.

The question of the source of power is one of the biggest distractions that people use. There is no connection between the source of the power and the maximization of its effective effect. The attempt to find the source of power is a covert attempt to transfer control, that is, the management of the free choice of that power into his hands. This is a certain type of dichotomous thinking according to which a person who controls a certain subject should fully control it, especially if it is an internal subject. If there is one area in which there is no control, it is a sign that all other areas of control should be transferred to the hands of an external source.

Therefore, the distraction that deals with the source of inner strength is one of the most deceptive stepping stones to self-healing.

The relationship between war and peace is a relatively new system. In the middle of the previous period of investigation on Earth, the investigation of lack and abundance, there was a disconnect between the two concepts. The transition between war and peace was an initiated transition that is considered one of the greatest ideals in human development. Many people have aspired to create inner peace, from the point of view that peace is a form of stability for fulfilling one’s role on earth.

Over the years the definition has become more blurred. Peace has become the absence of war. We will sort out words with positive and negative connotations, and we will have a clear axis of activity for development: jealousy, hatred, pain, sorrow, frustration, and effort outside the scope to reach full inner peace. For complete peace that does not include deviation from the powers that awareness tells us we have. The question arises: since when does an attempt to pass the accepted threshold of success, and succeed beyond expectations become negative and sometimes even seen as harmful?

The relationship between war and peace nowadays is more complex. War and peace are intertwined in a way that makes it difficult to tell the difference. The situations in private and collective life have to be so extreme that we see the boundaries between them. As a result, two intermediate situations were created: the war in peace and the peace in war.

These situations cause a mirage since the part that is easy for the person using them to stand out attracts his direction.

Most of the time, it is the intermediate states that manage the internal relationship between peace and war.

Recognizing and identifying these situations also makes the discussion of internal peace irrelevant to the new investigation.

A war in peace is a war whose values are so justified that there is no conflict about its values. The vision that accompanies the war in peace is agreed upon by all parties, there is relatively little conflict regarding the way of its existence. The conflict is indeed minimal, but the peace in which it exists is what increases it.

Peace in war is the second intermediate state that is important to provide on the spectrum of peace and war. Peace in war is a situation in which a person is unable to contain the feeling of war within himself and then he tries to create peace in any possible way.

The feeling of inadequacy overwhelms him, and he clings to peace, a relatively moderate or extreme variety of the tool known to all of us: “fake it until you make it”. Peace in war is such an extreme attempt to reach peace that stability turns into indifference, the desire becomes meaningless and the feeling of being there comes without noticing and overwhelms the heart.

My recommendation in this article is to give up the question of war and peace. This is a spectrum that discusses the lack and abundance of stability and inner peace that can be permanent when not questioned. Issues such as confidence, self-worth, recognition of abilities, and the use of levels and hierarchies to define awareness and consciousness also fall into the same spectrum.

Remember – when you ask yourself questions – you have already answered the layer that you unconsciously define as the answers that reflect the question just like a mirror image.

Share This Post
Have your say!
20

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>